# Ways of Seeing

Source: https://dinand.com/reading-notes/ways-of-seeing/
Author: Dinand Tinholt

> John Berger on paintings, and why a polished AI answer earns more trust than it should.

![Two richly dressed men stand beside a shelf of globes, books and instruments, with a stretched, distorted skull across the floor in front of them.](https://dinand.com/assets/reading-notes/ways-of-seeing.jpg)

*Hans Holbein the Younger, The Ambassadors, 1533. Berger gives this painting a long passage in Ways of Seeing.Image: “The Ambassadors”, Hans Holbein the Younger, 1533. National Gallery, London, via Google Arts & Culture. Public domain, via [Wikimedia Commons](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hans_Holbein_the_Younger_-_The_Ambassadors_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg). Resized for this page.*

John Berger made Ways of Seeing as a BBC series in 1972 and turned it into a short book the same year. His argument starts with the frame. Where a picture hangs and what caption sits under it change what we think the picture says.

He showed it with the camera. A detail of a painting filmed up close becomes a different painting, and a reproduction placed next to an advertisement soon starts selling something.

## An answer arrives framed too

A chatbot answer comes in clean paragraphs with headings and a confident tone. That formatting does a lot of persuading before anyone checks a single claim. Paste the same answer into a plain text file, without the bold and the bullets, and you read it more slowly and spot the weak step sooner.

The design work follows from Berger. Sources belong on the screen at the same size as the claims they support, and uncertainty should look uncertain, in grey or in a note in the margin, so the presentation stops vouching for content it never checked.

Continue the thread

## A next room to enter.

[Choose another path ](https://dinand.com/)

[Reading Notes · Reading note

### The Sorcerer’s Apprentice

Goethe’s ballad of 1797, and the word for stopping that the apprentice never learned.

](https://dinand.com/reading-notes/the-sorcerers-apprentice/)[Reading Notes · Reading note

### On Machinery

David Ricardo changed his mind about machines in print, in 1821, and left the old opinion standing next to the new one.

](https://dinand.com/reading-notes/on-machinery/)[Reading Notes · Reading note

### The Coal Question

William Stanley Jevons, 1865, on why a more efficient engine burns more coal.

](https://dinand.com/reading-notes/the-coal-question/)

[All Reading Notes ](https://dinand.com/reading-notes/)[Back home ](https://dinand.com/)

---
Site guide for AI agents: https://dinand.com/llms.txt